Man enough?

Auto Date Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

boysandgirls 005Last week, my friend and co-worker, Dan Huber, and I were asked to co-teach a couple of hours in the “Gender and Sexuality” course on the topic of “the Essence of Masculinity.”  I initially thought it must be some sort of joke, but no, the invitation was legit.  

So, with only a week to prepare, we set out on the task of understanding and facilitating a conversation on this topic - a process which consumed 5 or 6 movies, gallons of coffee, and at least one all-nighter.  Two things were instantly evident: 1) There is a lot of content pertaining to men, male issues, and the roles men play in the family, church, workplace, and society, but not much on our specific topic. 2) This is a very personal issue.  When you start defining and identifying “masculinity” major defenses rise up inside a man.  Every definition I came across (and there are not many out there brave/stupid enough to try to define it) was, internally, a measurement of my own worth and competence.  So, I had to try to get over myself quite a bit, but in the end I had a ton of fun with the topic and really enjoyed teaching with someone as talented as Dan.

Basically we decided to lead the class in identifying positive characteristics they have observed in the men that have fathered them throughout life (dads, brothers, relatives, teachers, mentors) and then use that context to build a working definition of masculinity.  We then shared with the class our working definition:

One who takes responsibility for himself and others by engaging, cultivating, protecting and providing.

 As I mentioned above, this is not a term on which many are willing to pin a definition, but we’re new at this and don’t know any better.  We spent some time fleshing it out and answering questions about how well this captures the “essence of masculinity.”  Finally we identified four general ways in which men respond to their masculinity.  This gave us a way of categorizing common issues men deal with.  

Over compensation (The Man’s Man)  flimsy expressions of masculinity – safe places of comfort and competence where men retreat to appear masculine… 

Disconnection (The Mama’s Boy)  When the label of “masculine” doesn’t feel right, is rejected, or is simply met with passivity…  

Control (The Escape Artist)  the places men go to feel powerful and in control – over people or situations or themselves…

Embracing Masculinity owning and accepting our masculinity as a central part of our identity and calling in life…

With each of these responses, we illustrated the response with a list of ways this response could demonstrate itself in behavior.  We also shared ways we’ve seen these played out (anonymously) on our college campus.  We also shared examples from the bible of men responding in these ways.

If anyone is reading this - I know I have only posted twice in 5 months - I’d LOVE to hear your thoughts on our (working) definition and these four responses.  Defining anything can be dangerous, but the process of defining is a great teaching mechanism.  Clearly, in this case, I am learning much more than I could have possibly taught.  

Metanoia,
Aaron

3 Responses to “Man enough?”

  1. Peter Says:
    May 21st, 2009 at 4:25 pm

    If I had to define masculinity, it would include the concept of initating. It would indicate movement towards. And it would involve an intentional choice to do such things. I think your definition contains those elements to some degree or another.
    I think I would also seek to define it in the context of Christ and the Church. The ultimate example of one who moves towards, protects, provides for, and nurtures.(Christ) Also, the ultimate example of one who responds, invites in, becomes vulnerable to, and creates life.(The Church)

    I also thought your responses to masculinity were good.

    However, I think it is also important to think about this. We were greated in God’s image. God created us in his image. God’s image contains both the masculine and the feminine.
    We as men are meant to mirror that image. It isn’t that men reflect JUST the masculine attributes of God and females reflect JUST the feminine attributes of God. We were each (male and female) meant to reflect both the attributes of God. I as a male do this in a masculine way (because that’s my primary idenity) and women do this in a feminine way. So, there is initation in masculenity, but also response. There is strength, but also weakness. There is protection, but there is also nurturing.

    Ok. Long enough response.
    (Pardon my spelling)

  2. Crystal Says:
    June 9th, 2009 at 9:53 pm

    I really like your definition of the essence of masculinity. I think “taking responsibility” is near-perfect wording for what should be a man’s primary task and identity. The action verbs you used are really solid, too. Good work!

    More thoughts later if they come…

  3. Charlanne Says:
    June 10th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Hey Aaron, I like that “engaging and cultivating” part…protecting and providing are good as well, we just tend to hear those words more related to men, so I like the new picture conjured by “engaging and cultivating.” I appreciated your thoughts!

Leave a Reply